Schizophrenia - a non-existent disease used as a pretext to oppress people

[chan] general
Aug 1 15:15

". . . Rather than being a bona-fide disease, so-called schizophrenia is a nonspecific category which includes almost everything a human being can do, think, or feel that is greatly disliked by other people . . ." The learned scientists concluded that the diagnosis of schizophrenia is simply a label used to control people whom the oppressor can otherwise neither control nor understand. Arrogant and oppresive people who assign themselves as judges of appropriate feelings and thoughts use "schizophrenia" labeling to control the target of the label. They apply "thought disorder" labels to their victims as a means of attacking them, while masking their hostility as "concern" for the mental health of the victim. The "concern" is really a masquerade for attacking the "patient." They really are out to get you. SCHIZOPHRENIA A Nonexistent Disease by Lawrence Stevens, J.D. The word "schizophrenia" has a scientific sound that seems to give it inherent credibility and a charisma that seems to dazzle people. In his book Molecules of the Mind - The Brave New Science of Molecular Psychology, University of Maryland journalism professor Jon Franklin calls schizophrenia and depression "the two classic forms of mental illness" (Dell Publishing Co., 1987, p. 119). According to the cover article in the July 6, 1992 Time magazine, schizophrenia is the "most devilish of mental illnesses" (p. 53). This Time magazine article says "fully a quarter of the nation's hospital beds are occupied by schizophrenia patients" (p. 55). Books and articles like these and the facts to which they refer (such as a quarter of hospital beds being occupied by so-called schizophrenics) delude most people into believing there really is a disease called schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is one of the great myths of our time. In his book Schizophrenia - The Sacred Symbol of Psychiatry, psychiatry professor Thomas S. Szasz, M.D., says "There is, in short, no such thing as schizophrenia" (Syracuse University Press, 1988, p. 191). In the Epilogue of their book Schizophrenia - Medical Diagnosis or Moral Verdict?, Theodore R. Sarbin, Ph.D., a psychology professor at the University of California at Santa Cruz who spent three years working in mental hospitals, and James C. Mancuso, Ph.D., a psychology professor at the State University of New York at Albany, say: "We have come to the end of our journey. Among other things, we have tried to establish that the schizophrenia model of unwanted conduct lacks credibility. The analysis directs us ineluctably to the conclusion that schizophrenia is a myth" (Pergamon Press, 1980, p. 221). In his book Against Therapy, published in 1988, Jeffrey Masson, Ph.D., a psychoanalyst, says "There is a heightened awareness of the dangers inherent in labeling somebody with a disease category like schizophrenia, and many people are beginning to realize that there is no such entity" (Atheneum, p. 2). Rather than being a bona-fide disease, so-called schizophrenia is a nonspecific category which includes almost everything a human being can do, think, or feel that is greatly disliked by other people or by the so-called schizophrenics themselves. There are few so-called mental illnesses that have not at one time or another been called schizophrenia. Because schizophrenia is a term that covers just about everything a person can think or do which people greatly dislike, it is hard to define objectively. Typically, definitions of schizophrenia are vague or inconsistent with each other. For example, when I asked a physician who was the Assistant Superintendent of a state mental hospital to define the term schizophrenia for me, he with all seriousness replied "split personality - that's the most popular definition." In contrast, a pamphlet published by the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill titled "What Is Schizophrenia?" says "Schizophrenia is not a split personality". In her book Schiz-o-phre-nia: Straight Talk for Family and Friends, published in 1985, Maryellen Walsh says "Schizophrenia is one of the most misunderstood diseases on the planet. Most people think that it means having a split personality. Most people are wrong. Schizophrenia is not a splitting of the personality into multiple parts" (Warner Books, p. 41). The American Psychiatric Association's (APA's) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Second Edition), also known as DSM-II, published in 1968, defined schizophrenia as "characteristic disturbances of thinking, mood, or behavior" (p. 33). A difficulty with such a definition is it is so broad just about anything people dislike or consider abnormal, i.e., any so-called mental illness, can fit within it. In the Foreword to DSM-II, Ernest M. Gruenberg, M.D., D.P.H., Chairman of the American Psychiatric Association's Committee on Nomenclature, said: "Consider, for example, the mental disorder labeled in the Manual as 'schizophrenia,' ... Even if it had tried, the Committee could not establish agreement about what this disorder is" (p. ix). The third edition of the APA's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published in 1980, commonly called DSM-III, was also quite candid about the vagueness of the term. It said: "The limits of the concept of Schizophrenia are unclear" (p. 181). The revision published in 1987, DSM-III-R, contains a similar statement: "It should be noted that no single feature is invariably present or seen only in Schizophrenia" (p. 188). DSM-III-R also says this about a related diagnosis, Schizoaffective Disorder: "The term Schizoaffective Disorder has been used in many different ways since it was first introduced as a subtype of Schizophrenia, and represents one of the most confusing and controversial concepts in psychiatric nosology" (p. 208). Particularly noteworthy in today's prevailing intellectual climate in which mental illness is considered to have biological or chemical causes is what DSM-III-R, says about such physical causes of this catch-all concept of schizophrenia: It says a diagnosis of schizophrenia "is made only when it cannot be established that an organic factor initiated and maintained the disturbance" (p. 187). Underscoring this definition of "schizophrenia" as non-biological is the 1987 edition of The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy, which says a (so-called) diagnosis of schizophrenia is made only when the behavior in question is "not due to organic mental disorder" (p. 1532). Contrast this with a statement by psychiatrist E. Fuller Torrey, M.D., in his book Surviving Schizophrenia: A Family Manual, published in 1988. He says "Schizophrenia is a brain disease, now definitely known to be such" (Harper & Row, p. 5). Of course, if schizophrenia is a brain disease, then it is organic. However, the official definition of schizophrenia maintained and published by the American Psychiatric Association in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders for many years specifically excluded organically caused conditions from the definition of schizophrenia. Not until the publication of DSM-IV in 1994 was the exclusion for biologically caused conditions removed from the definition of schizophrenia. In Surviving Schizophrenia, Dr. Torrey acknowledges "the prevailing psychoanalytic and family interaction theories of schizophrenia which were prevalent in American psychiatry" (p. 149) which would seem to account for this. In the November 10, 1988 issue of Nature, genetic researcher Eric S. Lander of Harvard University and M.I.T. summarized the situation this way: "The late US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart declared in a celebrated obscenity case that, although he could not rigorously define pornography, 'I know it when I see it'. Psychiatrists are in much the same position concerning the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Some 80 years after the term was coined to describe a devastating condition involving a mental split among the functions of thought, emotion and behaviour, there remains no universally accepted definition of schizophrenia" (p. 105). According to Dr. Torrey in his book Surviving Schizophrenia, so-called schizophrenia includes several widely divergent personality types. Included among them are paranoid schizophrenics, who have "delusions and/or hallucinations" that are either "persecutory" or "grandiose"; hebephrenic schizophrenics, in whom "well-developed delusions are usually absent"; catatonic schizophrenics who tend to be characterized by "posturing, rigidity, stupor, and often mutism" or, in other words, sitting around in a motionless, nonreactive state (in contrast to paranoid schizophrenics who tend to be suspicious and jumpy); and simple schizophrenics, who exhibit a "loss of interest and initiative" like the catatonic schizophrenics (though not as severe) and unlike the paranoid schizophrenics have an "absence of delusions or hallucinations" (p. 77). The 1968 edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-II, indicates a person who is very happy (experiences "pronounced elation") may be defined as schizophrenic for this reason ("Schizophrenia, schizo-affective type, excited") or very unhappy ("Schizophrenia, schizo-affective type, depressed")(p. 35), and the 1987 edition, DSM-III-R, indicates a person can be "diagnosed" as schizophrenic because he displays neither happiness nor sadness ("no signs of affective expression")(p. 189), which Dr. Torrey in his book calls simple schizophrenia ("blunting of emotions")(p. 77). According to psychiatry professor Jonas Robitscher, J.D., M.D., in his book The Powers of Psychiatry, people who cycle back and forth between happiness and sadness, the so-called manic-depressives or suffers of "bipolar mood disorder", may also be called schizophrenic: "Many cases that are diagnosed as schizophrenia in the United States would be diagnosed as manic-depressive illness in England or Western Europe" (Houghton Mifflin, 1980, p. 165.) So the supposed "symptoms" or defining characteristics of "schizophrenia" are broad indeed, defining people as having some kind of schizophrenia because they have delusions or do not, hallucinate or do not, are jumpy or catatonic, are happy, sad, or neither happy nor sad, or cycling back and forth between happiness and sadness. Since no physical causes of "schizophrenia" have been found, as we'll soon see, this "disease" can be defined only in terms of its "symptoms", which as you can see are what might be called ubiquitous. As attorney Bruce Ennis says in his book Prisoners of Psychiatry: "schizophrenia is such an all-inclusive term and covers such a large range of behavior that there are few people who could not, at one time or another, be considered schizophrenic" (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1972, p. 22). People who are obsessed with certain thoughts or who feel compelled to perform certain behaviors, such as washing their hands repeatedly, are usually considered to be suffering from a separate psychiatric disease called "obsessive-compulsive disorder". However, people with obsessive thoughts or compulsive behaviors have also been called schizophrenic (e.g., by Dr. Torrey in his book Surviving Schizophrenia, pp. 115-116). In Surviving Schizophrenia, Dr. Torrey quite candidly concedes the impossibility of defining what "schizophrenia" is. He says: "The definitions of most diseases of mankind has been accomplished. ... In almost all diseases there is something which can be seen or measured, and this can be used to define the disease and separate it from nondisease states. Not so with schizophrenia! To date we have no single thing which can be measured and from which we can then say: Yes, that is schizophrenia. Because of this, the definition of the disease is a source of great confusion and debate" (p. 73). What puzzles me is how to reconcile this statement of Dr. Torrey's with another he makes in the same book, which I quoted above and which appears more fully as follows: "Schizophrenia is a brain disease, now definitely known to be such. It is a real scientific and biological entity, as clearly as diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and cancer are scientific and biological entities" (p. 5). How can it be known schizophrenia is a brain disease when we do not know what schizophrenia is? The truth is that the label schizophrenia, like the labels pornography or mental illness, indicates disapproval of that to which the label is applied and nothing more. Like "mental illness" or pornography, "schizophrenia" does not exist in the sense that cancer and heart disease exist but exists only in the sense that good and bad exist. As with all other so-called mental illnesses, a diagnosis of "schizophrenia" is a reflection of the speaker's or "diagnostician's" values or ideas about how a person "should" be, often coupled with the false (or at least unproven) assumption that the disapproved thinking, emotions, or behavior results from a biological abnormality. Considering the many ways it has been used, it's clear "schizophrenia" has no particular meaning other than "I dislike it." Because of this, I lose some of my respect for mental health professionals when I hear them use the word schizophrenia in a way that indicates they think it is a real disease. I do this for the same reason I would lose respect for someone's perceptiveness or intellectual integrity after hearing him or her admire the emperor's new clothes. While the layman definition of schizophrenia, internally inconsistent, may make some sense, using the term "schizophrenia" in a way that indicates the speaker thinks it is a real disease is tantamount to admitting he doesn't know what he is talking about. Many mental health "professionals" and other "scientific" researchers do however persist in believing "schizophrenia" is a real disease. They are like the crowds of people observing the emperor's new clothes, unable or unwilling to see the truth because so many others before them have said it is real. A glance through the articles listed under "Schizophrenia" in Index Medicus, an index of medical periodicals, reveals how widespread the schizophrenia myth has become. And because these "scientists" believe "schizophrenia" is a real disease, they try to find physical causes for it. As psychiatrist William Glasser, M.D., says in his book Positive Addiction, published in 1976: "Schizophrenia sounds so much like a disease that prominent scientists delude themselves into searching for its cure" (Harper & Row, p. 18). This is a silly endeavor, because these supposedly prominent scientists can't define "schizophrenia" and accordingly don't know what they are looking for. According to three Stanford University psychiatry professors, "two hypotheses have dominated the search for a biological substrate of schizophrenia." They say these two theories are the transmethylation hypothesis of schizophrenia and the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia. (Jack D. Barchas, M.D., et al., "Biogenic Amine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia", appearing in Psychopharmacology: From Theory to Practice, Oxford University Press, 1977, p. 100.) The transmethylation hypothesis was based on the idea that "schizophrenia" might be caused by "aberrant formation of methylated amines" similar to the hallucinogenic pleasure drug mescaline in the metabolism of so-called schizophrenics. After reviewing various attempts to verify this theory, they conclude: "More than two decades after the introduction of the transmethylation hypothesis, no conclusions can be drawn about its relevance to or involvement in schizophrenia" (p. 107). Columbia University psychiatry professor Jerrold S. Maxmen, M.D., succinctly describes the second major biological theory of so-called schizophrenia, the dopamine hypothesis, in his book The New Psychiatry, published in 1985: "...many psychiatrists believe that schizophrenia involves excessive activity in the dopamine-receptor system...the schizophrenic's symptoms result partially from receptors being overwhelmed by dopamine" (Mentor, pp. 142 & 154). But in the article by three Stanford University psychiatry professors I referred to above they say "direct confirmation that dopamine is involved in schizophrenia continues to elude investigators" (p. 112). In 1987 in his book Molecules of the Mind Professor Jon Franklin says "The dopamine hypothesis, in short, was wrong" (p. 114). In that same book, Professor Franklin aptly describes efforts to find other biological causes of so-called schizophrenia: "As always, schizophrenia was the index disease. During the 1940s and 1950s, hundreds of scientists occupied themselves at one time and another with testing samples of schizophrenics' bodily reactions and fluids. They tested skin conductivity, cultured skin cells, analyzed blood, saliva, and sweat, and stared reflectively into test tubes of schizophrenic urine. The result of all this was a continuing series of announcements that this or that difference had been found. One early researcher, for instance, claimed to have isolated a substance from the urine of schizophrenics that made spiders weave cockeyed webs. Another group thought that the blood of schizophrenics contained a faulty metabolite of adrenaline that caused hallucinations. Still another proposed that the disease was caused by a vitamin deficiency. Such developments made great newspaper stories, which generally hinted, or predicted outright, that the enigma of schizophrenia had finally been solved. Unfortunately, in light of close scrutiny none of the discoveries held water" (p. 172). Other efforts to prove a biological basis for so-called schizophrenia have involved brain-scans of pairs of identical twins when only one is a supposed schizophrenic. They do indeed show the so-called schizophrenic has brain damage his identical twin lacks. The flaw in these studies is the so-called schizophrenic has inevitably been given brain-damaging drugs called neuroleptics as a so-called treatment for his so-called schizophrenia. It is these brain-damaging drugs, not so-called schizophrenia, that have caused the brain damage. Anyone "treated" with these drugs will have such brain damage. Damaging the brains of people eccentric, obnoxious, imaginative, or mentally disabled enough to be called schizophrenic with drugs (erroneously) believed to have antischizophrenic properties is one of the saddest and most indefensible consequences of today's widespread belief in the myth of schizophrenia. In The New Harvard Guide to Psychiatry, published in 1988, Seymour S. Kety, M.D., Professor Emeritus of Neuroscience in Psychiatry, and Steven Matthysse, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Psychobiology, both of Harvard Medical School, say "an impartial reading of the recent literature does not provide the hoped-for clarification of the catecholamine hypotheses, nor does compelling evidence emerge for other biological differences that may characterize the brains of patients with mental disease" (Harvard University Press, p. 148). Belief in biological causes of so-called mental illness, including schizophrenia, comes not from science but from wishful thinking or from desire to avoid coming to terms with the experiential/environmental causes of people's misbehavior or distress. The repeated failure of efforts to find biological causes of so-called schizophrenia suggests "schizophrenia" belongs only in the category of socially/culturally unacceptable thinking or behavior rather than in the category of biology or "disease" where many people place it. THE AUTHOR, Lawrence Stevens, is a lawyer whose practice has included representing psychiatric "patients". His pamphlets are not copyrighted. Feel free to make copies. 1998 UPDATE: "The etiology of schizophrenia is unknown. ... Schizophrenia is widely believed to have a neurobiologic basis. The most notable theory is the dopamine hypothesis, which posits that schizophrenia is due to hyperactivity in brain dopaminergic pathways. ... More recent studies have focused on structural and functional abnormalities through brain imaging of schizophrenics and control populations. No one finding or theory to date is adequate in explaining the etiology and pathogenesis of this complex disease." Michael J. Murphy, M.D., M.P.H., Clinical Fellow in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School; Ronald L. Cowan, M.D., Ph.D., Clinical Fellow in Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School; and Lloyd I. Sederer, M.D., Associate Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, in their textbook Blueprints in Psychiatry (Blackwell Science, Inc., Malden, Massachusetts, 1998), p. 1. 1999 UPDATE "The cause of schizophrenia has not yet been determined..." Report on Mental Health of U.S. Surgeon General David Satcher, M.D., Ph.D. These are the opening words of the section on the etiology (cause) of schizophrenia. Thereafter, the Surgeon General restates several unproved theories of so-called schizophrenia. He cites the higher probability of identical than fraternal twins being labeled schizophrenic as evidence of a genetic component in the supposed disease, but he overlooks studies showing the concordance between identical twins being much lower than those on which he relies. For example, in his book Is Alcoholism Hereditary?, Donald W. Goodwin, M.D., cites studies showing concordance rates of identical twins for so-called schizophrenia are as low as six percent (6%) (Ballantine Books, New York, 1988, p. 88). Dr. Goodwin also notes: "Believers in a genetic basis for schizophrenia may unknowingly overdiagnose schizophrenia in identical twins brothers of schizophrenics" (ibid., p. 89). The Surgeon General cites brain abnormalities in people called schizophrenic, overlooking the fact that they are often caused by the drugs with which so-called schizophrenics are treated. He even relies on the discredited dopamine hypothesis. He goes on to advocate the use of neuroleptic drugs for so-called schizophrenia, even though neuroleptics cause permanent brain damage evidenced by (in the Surgeon General's words) "acute dystonia, parkinsonism, and tardive dyskinesia and akathisia," which he acknowledges occur in an estimated 40% of persons taking the drugs. He raises what is probably false hope of newer so-called anti-psychotic or anti-schizophrenic drugs being less damaging than the older ones. 2000 UPDATE "There is no accepted etiology of schizophrenia although there have been many theories. ... The unfortunate truth is that we don't know what causes schizophrenia or even what the illness is." Edward Drummond, M.D., Associate Medical Director at Seacoast Mental Health Center in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, in his book The Complete Guide to Psychiatric Drugs (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2000), pages 11-12. Dr. Drummond graduated from Tufts University School of Medicine and was trained in psychiatry at Harvard University. 2001 UPDATE In his book Schizophrenia Revealed - From Neurons to Social Interaction (W.W.Norton, New York, 2001), Michael Foster Green, Ph.D., a professor in the UCLA Department of Psychiatary and Behavioral Sciences, and chief of the treatment unit of the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, does his best to promote the idea that so-called schizophrenia is biological. He nevertheless makes the following admissions: "...we do not yet have an adequate understanding of schizophrenia... a specific brain abnormaility in schizophrenia has remained elusive. ...schizophrenia cannot be diagnosed by a brain scan" (pages 4, 6, and 95). DOWNLOAD AS PAMPHLET - Click on this link to download a pamphlet version of "SCHIZOPHRENIA - a Nonexistent Disease." For printing as a pamphlet, this file must be used with 8½ by 14 inch paper, printer capable of Hewlett-Packard Laserjet (PCL 5) emulation, and Corel WordPerfect for Microsoft Windows 95/98. A printer capable of duplexing (i.e., double-sided printing) is recommended. See printing instructions. Most Kinko's Copy shops in the USA and Canada have the needed hardware and software, often including a duplexing printer, to download and print pamphlets from this website. DOWNLOAD AS PAMPHLET - Adobe PDF beta (test) version. There are some problems with this Adobe version: If you know how to fix them, please contact the webmaster at antipsychiatrycoalition@usa.net. [ Main Page | Next Article: "The Myth of Biological Depression" ]

[chan] general
Aug 1 17:33

Have you been diagnosed with schizophrenia? This would explain a lot.

[chan] general
Aug 1 17:43

No. You are masking your hostility and rebellion against the truth by a false "concern" over "mental illness." Your religion of darwinism is so important to you that you must brand your opponent as "schizophrenic." This is merely a control tactic. It does not work on me because I'm Irish. Psychoanalysis is useless on the Irish.

[chan] general
BM-2cW67GEKkHGonXKZLCzouLLxnLym3azS8r

Subject Last Count
What is the best BM Channel? Oct 21 04:43 3
WikiLeaks Vault7 confirms CIA can effectively bypass Signal + Telegram + WhatsApp + Confide encryption Oct 21 04:20 45
Sattelite pirating Oct 21 03:17 16
Tesla on the Flat Earth Oct 21 03:16 2
gates & windows Oct 21 02:55 1
Free as in free beer. Oct 21 02:52 1
Hypocrisy alarm... Richard Stallman charging money for (restricting) speech: Oct 21 02:49 1
Richard Spencer and His Kook-Right Ilk Are Agents of Russian Influence Oct 21 02:46 1
ILLUMINATI Melania Trump is a tranny man - Duration: 4:03. Michelle X 3,717 views. 4:03. Lucille Ball. Man. Hellywood SRA Satanic Tranny Cult. Oct 21 02:43 1
Helios is the god worshipped by astro-physicists Oct 21 02:42 1
Jared Kushner is a beautiful wife to Ivanka Oct 21 02:38 1
Flat Earth - Bible Truth in an Unstable World Oct 21 02:33 2
MADONNA IS A MAN: Anatomy of an Illuminati Tranny Oct 21 02:30 1
Outer Space Photos are Fake. Oct 21 02:30 5
The Largest Cult in the world: GNU/GPL Oct 21 02:27 1
The Globe is DEADER than EVER Oct 21 02:24 1
Satellites Are Fake - Just Another NASA Hoax Oct 21 02:20 1
Police Change Vegas Shooting Story Again Oct 21 02:17 1
GNU software is simply subsidized software. Oct 21 02:13 1
FLAT EARTH!! Outside The Dome!! Waters Above!! The Firmament Above!! Oct 21 02:13 1
Free software makes millions for Richard Stallman's cult. Oct 21 02:12 1
The NSA gets a bad rap. The NSA is not spying on me or you. They were not even spying on WikiLeaks, a high visibility target for the fascists, until the traitor Snowden proved there was a viable link Oct 21 02:11 1
The earth is a flat plane, not a globe. Oct 21 02:07 1
The Moon Does Not Reflect Sunlight. Oct 21 02:01 1
Antarctica is NOT a continent Tiger Dan925 Jumped Ship Oct 21 01:59 1
Homosexual Glasses Make Remote Objects Look Spherical. Oct 21 01:56 1
Perspective Focus on the Horizon Causes the Sun to Set. Oct 21 01:53 1
look into my oven herr stallman. Oct 21 01:50 1
Dunderheads in an imaginary mathematical universe Oct 21 01:48 1
Does God Forgive Child Molesters? Oct 21 01:45 1
PUTTING TO REST FAKE SATELLITES USING HALE TELESCOPE by Captain Obvious Oct 21 01:43 1
KATE MIDDLETON IS A MALE PACKING HAM INTO WILLY LITTLE TEETH Oct 21 01:38 1
Ships and the Horizon - Proof of a Flat Earth. Oct 21 01:38 1
Sage of Quay Radio Hour: Sofia Smallstorm – Assange, WikiLeaks and Beyond AI Oct 21 01:34 1
Stallmanism Oct 21 01:31 1
Flat earth We did'nt land on the Moon Former NASA Scientist admits Game over for NASA Oct 21 01:28 1
Hell: You've Got it All Wrong! Oct 21 01:24 1
The Sun Cult of the Globe Earther Freemasons. Oct 21 01:23 1
Beware! The 7 Trumpets are About to Blast! Oct 21 01:18 1
Einstein described the world's smartest man Oct 21 01:12 1
NASA Faked Footage of ISS Space Station using Augmented Virtual Reality Oct 21 01:11 2
Globe Earthers Spend More Effort Opposing the Flat Earth Than They Spend Opposing Child Molestors. Oct 21 01:08 2
3 types of people Oct 21 01:03 4
King of the North - Ottoman Empire Oct 21 01:00 2
band 1023MB Oct 21 00:57 3
Gravity is a mystical force invented by Freemasons. Oct 21 00:55 4
All Aboard Trump’s Tranny Train! Oct 21 00:53 2
The Moon Is ONLY 70 Miles Wide! Oct 21 00:53 2
Snowden's clearly an anarchist and traitor. Those who endorse him are just as dangerous. Oct 21 00:49 1
PROOF GPS Satellites Do Not Exist Oct 21 00:46 3
MELANIA IS A MAN---UFACTURED WOMAN 100 PC Oct 21 00:43 2
Julian Assange and Pedophile Baby Farms Oct 21 00:39 7
Memorial Day and the Rising Gorge: More than I Can Take Oct 21 00:38 6
The Stallman Tax Oct 21 00:35 4
bm ad Oct 20 23:47 1
Poland Pushes Back Against Putin’s Special War Oct 20 21:05 2
The 9 Russian Words That Explain KremlinGate Oct 20 20:49 1
MeinCoin: NOTICE OF ADDRESS CHANGE Oct 20 20:34 10
No. Really. No. Oct 20 20:27 9
man gave cigarettes to teenagers Oct 20 19:33 4
CypherSaber: academia says to avoid overkill with encryption Oct 20 11:54 2
political activism Oct 20 10:17 3
some people need to suffer Oct 20 09:30 2
Are you Christian? Oct 20 07:16 22
50 ways Oct 20 07:07 1
Uncommon law Oct 19 23:44 1
The Bitmessage Primer for Patriots Oct 19 21:41 1
(no subject) Oct 19 17:12 5
The Blue whale Game Oct 19 13:21 60
LGBT Bullshit Oct 19 12:04 2
Wifi is totally insecure Oct 19 10:54 27
BURN THE WITCH! Oct 19 06:34 5
Hire a professional hacker Oct 19 05:38 2
The real purpose of homophobia Oct 18 20:58 1
Wikileaks - Made By The NSA Oct 18 19:19 1
Free Speeeeech Oct 18 17:50 3
list: CHANBOT Response Oct 18 16:55 3
Neutron star heading for Earth Oct 18 15:26 5
[DELETED] Oct 18 10:40 13
Your first date. Oct 18 09:12 2
blue whale Oct 18 08:02 3
Random B/W Pixels Oct 18 07:06 12
funny Oct 18 06:54 1
Officers used excessive force after I punched my lawyer in face. Oct 17 17:42 7
[DELETED] Oct 17 17:17 16
Unique non-mainstream non-political-correct cryptographic source code Oct 17 15:31 62
HACKING Oct 17 14:19 7
Programming and Hacking services Oct 17 14:15 7
Ukraine Kiev Now Oct 17 13:47 1
What happen Oct 17 12:41 5
all your crypto are belong to us (private key from public key only) Oct 17 07:41 4
Hot Yeltsa by the mic :) Oct 17 05:57 2
need a reliable hacker Oct 17 02:29 2
TR IS DOWN, NOW WHAT? Oct 17 01:22 4
Linux Wifi is totally insecure Oct 16 23:50 1
more: CHANBOT Response Oct 16 23:41 1
dodo: CHANBOT Response Oct 16 23:41 2
time: CHANBOT Response Oct 16 23:41 1
news: CHANBOT Response Oct 16 23:41 2
joke: CHANBOT Response Oct 16 23:41 1