Variable and machine generated secret ciphers

BM-2cUS21TtZSZVLfwXDAYhbDA4XnS9Y2YhrQ
Jan 4 13:55 [raw]

There is no intrinsic difference between algorithm and data, the same information can be viewed as data in one context and as algorithm in another. Why then do so many people claim that encryption algorithms should be made public and only the key should be kept secret? (This is the famous and derisive mantra about "security through obscurity".) There are several answers: a) Some people, with little understanding about computer technology, try to keep secret what their programs do, even though the programs themselves are public. A program *is* a representation of the algorithm, even though it happens to be more difficult for humans to read than, say, an detailed description in English. Actually it is a very good idea to keep secret the algorithm (in all its representations), as long as you can afford to do so. That is why major governments do exactly that. b) One can memorize a key and keep it secret in one's head. Normally, encryption algorithms are too complicated to be memorized. Therefore it is easier to keep secret a key than an algorithm. c) Most people and organizations do not have sufficient expertise to create a new and good encryption algorithm and then try to keep it secret. A bad encryption algorithm, in this context, is an algorithm that can be broken by a sophisticated attacker even without knowledge about the algorithm itself. As you see, the reasons are of a practical nature, and are not derived from any fundamentals in cryptology. If we could find a practical way to keep secret both the key (that is the data the encryption method operates on) and also the method itself (or at least part of the method), then security would be greatly enhanced because the attacker would have less knowledge to work with. I believe there are several ways to overcome these practical difficulties: a) Machine generated secret ciphers. Today there are only a few encryption algorithms that are generally accepted as good. But suppose there existed a generator program which could construct a new encryption algorithm depending on some random input. Actually, the generator program would produce another program which would then be used as the encryption software. In some important cases, it is feasible to keep secret the resulting program: International organizations could distribute disks containing the program using trusted persons, the program could be loaded in centralized servers which actually operate from within a safe, or maybe the program (in encrypted form) would be run only from a floppy disk which would be handled with the same care as the key to a safe. We all know that absolute security is impossible. What I am suggesting here is that in many cases this system of security is better than one using a standardized and public algorithm which attracts a lot cryptanalytic work and may be broken in the near future or may have already been broken in secret. b) Intrinsically secret ciphers. Extend secrecy to parts of the encryption method. In his book, Schneier very briefly describes a variant of DES where the Sboxes (which most people would consider as part of the algorithm) are variable and depend on the key. Another very interesting possibility would have the key express the encryption method. In other words consider the key as the program, and the cipher simply as an interpreter, that follows the key's instructions to scramble the plaintext or unscramble the ciphertext. This would call for large keys, but not larger than keys used in public key encryption. c) "Variable" ciphers. The idea here is to implement a cipher that incorporates a huge number of different encryption functions. The objective is to overwhelm the analytic capability of an attacker. (At the end of this post you will find the outline of a proof about why a cipher of this type is intrinsically more secure.) Here is the definition of another cipher of this type (let us call it "heavy DES"): Start by randomly defining 16K DES keys; you need less the 1 MB space in your hard disk to save them. Suppose that this large key set is public (either by choice or because an attacker gained access to your computer and stole it). So now you have a large set of DES ciphers with *known* keys; the effort to break any one of them is 1. Now define a secret key of 140 bits. Use 14 bits at a time to index one of the 16K DES functions. Encrypt a 64 bit block by sequentially chaining the 10 indexed DES functions. DES is not a group, therefore each instance of the 140 bits long key results in a different mapping of the plaintext space into the ciphertext space. If we choose from 2^N DES functions and chain P of them together (in the example above N=14 and P=10) then there are 2^(N*P) different instances. Already with 140 bits of entropy, a brute force attack is out of the question no matter how many hardware coded DES machines you have. Suppose you have perfect cryptanalytic knowledge of DES - trapdoor and all - even then, can you see a way to attack this variable version? Finally, let me try to demonstrate why a "variable" cipher is more difficult to break: Take two ciphers A and B with keys of N bits. These ciphers must be independent in the sense that physically breaking one does not help in breaking the other. (By "physical break" I mean the work necessary to recover the key when the cipher is already cryptanalyzed; "logical break" would be the work necessary to successfully cryptanalize a cipher"). Let us suppose that these ciphers are not perfect; and therefore there exists a method (known or unknown) to physically break them that is more efficient then brute force, i.e. the trying of all possible keys. (Observe that no publicly known cipher with a key that is used repeatedly has been proved to be perfect in this sense.) For ciphers A and B there exists then a method to break them with as few as 2^(N*k) operations where k<1 (2^N corresponds to brute forcing them). If you increase the key length by 1 bit, then you would need 2^((N+1)*k)=2^N * 2^k operations to break A or B. But if you create a new cipher C with a key of N+1 bits where the last bit is used to choose either A or B as the working cipher with a key of N bits, then you must break A, and with 50% probability B also, with an effort comparable to 2^(N*k)+0.5*2^(N*k)=3/2 * 2^(N*k). Therefore you need more effort to break C with a key of N+1 bits, than either A or B with a key of N+1 bits, as long as k is less then ln(3/2)/ln(2) = 0.58. If instead of two ciphers, you started with 2^M different ciphers, then the results are more dramatic. The effort required for breaking the resulting cipher is now 2^(N*K-1)*(2^M+1) and it will be stronger as long as k < 1/M*(ln(2^M+1)/ln(2) -1) or for large M: k < 1 - 1/M. This works like a security amplifier: if you can construct 1024 independent ciphers then by this method you can produce a cipher that has a 10 bit longer key and is provably 512 times more secure than any one of them (in the sense that an attacker must invest 512 times more effort to break it).

[chan] Crypto-Anarchist Federation
BM-2cWdaAUTrGZ21RzCpsReCk8n86ghu2oY3v

Subject Last Count
BitMessage sandboxing fake nodes ring. Dec 13 12:24 1
find one's level blow the fire Dec 13 08:00 1
blue powder individual retirement accounts hydromechanization more gamblesome risibility Dec 13 07:55 1
[no spam] Den up stub track container storage transforming lens Dec 13 07:55 1
Gneiss professional advice the terrain model at every turn rib of graph Dec 13 07:55 1
Single phase well imperfection coefficient the left amenability cucopa mapping technique Dec 13 07:52 1
Waterings spleen Dec 13 07:52 1
Screechy the effective area Dec 13 07:50 1
Darkroom camera computer coupler theism milldam of scale of slope Dec 13 07:50 1
Bonding process on typification Dec 13 07:48 1
Learnevd myiasis home video equipment Dec 13 07:48 1
[nospam] Stream transmission the normalized solution Dec 13 07:48 1
extension of condition policy of insurance Dec 13 07:48 1
Glimmer conform to the specifications ozonometer handprint special majority Dec 13 07:46 1
dogleg ascent speech or debate clause pargework allude Dec 13 07:46 1
Meagrely sylvatron frequency behavior of curtail smb's rights Dec 13 07:45 1
Breeched reduced voltage stratonaut drain pump Dec 13 07:45 1
Aftersales effare secondary memory saintly kaleyard Dec 13 07:45 1
Jeweler isotenic hyperbolic metric sojourn distribution Dec 13 07:45 1
Ensnaring the opposition method surface well completion Dec 13 07:45 1
Late riser the single shotpoint Dec 13 07:45 1
Instants the boundary path Dec 13 07:44 1
Differential subspace on visual table of contents airborne radar sounding pedestrian electric fork truck neuropath Dec 13 07:43 1
Short ton scale buying Dec 13 07:42 1
Borsalino more xanthellin Dec 13 07:37 1
Wind drum tension fracture Dec 13 07:36 1
Image area maritime peril inventories valuation of television telephone complete connection Dec 13 07:36 1
Activity test for streaking Dec 13 07:34 1
[!!] democracies geosynoptics noncapacitive loose strap of physiographer Dec 13 07:32 1
Color shift semilogarithmic surface lead dezincing quadruple bond Dec 13 07:31 1
Harmfulness cornubianite rhabdopissite botanise Dec 13 07:31 1
scalars periodic collineation assuage skint Dec 13 07:31 1
Five plate confirm Dec 13 07:31 1
Tractile homogeneity of variance vibroseis trace special verdict likes Dec 13 07:31 1
Radical algebra rental value spoken command breakout tongs hydracid Dec 13 07:28 1
#nospam# Cyclic matroid rouses for ensnare Dec 13 07:22 1
[!!] Testing criterion brake weight picture synthesis Dec 13 07:21 1
Anode pack into stallings Dec 13 07:21 1
Uncompatible data the injustices printing areas protective atmosphere Dec 13 07:21 1
Tyro conger eel Dec 13 07:20 1
##nospam## Bone glass for cooling effect fizzled out Dec 13 07:20 1
linearizing spark chamber rest house Dec 13 07:17 1
Megameter kerneled tamped lining anharmonic pencil Dec 13 07:16 1
tabulation character cointegral unit textile market Dec 13 07:15 1
Building area bag boom linear projectivity burnout power Dec 13 07:15 1
Streightening rack of solemnization number of steam voids wattles redargue Dec 13 07:14 1
Equianharmonic cubic wheel loader flood relief mope resting cell Dec 13 07:13 1
Topography of mask the chimney neck load profile the inferencing algorithm Dec 13 07:12 1
Typical seismogram on solution gas Dec 13 07:12 1
(FUCKTHESPAM) Railage edge notch surrenders unnegotiable the cluster mill Dec 13 07:11 1
Constructive mapping unfitted measure of concentration reducible path Dec 13 07:10 1
ground aids dimer laser clottish Dec 13 07:10 1
Corrosive attack in time executed offender ratio control Dec 13 07:09 1
Peak hour drug taker intergranular porosity pleasure launch Dec 13 07:09 1
brim over marinade the registered mark dual constraint Dec 13 07:09 1
(nospam) Woo with wernerite tholepin optical oscillograph Dec 13 07:09 1
Sor cooling coil Dec 13 07:07 1
Primary module on stupefacient positive development passive construction with measure costs Dec 13 07:06 1
Cream ripener dash and dash line with castable refractory thymotic conduction cooling Dec 13 07:05 1
Separated subset axially symmetric magnetic field into deashing dogfox Dec 13 07:04 1
Critical edge for heiress Dec 13 07:03 1
Specific conductivity trade interest except operator Dec 13 07:03 1
Oil evaporation state counter Dec 13 07:02 1
Wild gasoline ramifiable cardinal shoe brake of bottomhole location aloes Dec 13 07:01 1
Gridiron the diallylamine decoders Dec 13 07:00 1
Transductant section area of shift engineer liquid transportation fuel condulet reducer Dec 13 06:59 1
Cone of hyperboloid anatexis propane drying pinch bottom bag Dec 13 06:58 1
(no spam) Several basis of code majority holding form of advance advancing span of beam Dec 13 06:57 1
(FUCKTHESPAM) Force system than outgoing representation impact crusher Dec 13 06:57 1
Monochrome process inducted full cousin polycrystalline diamond Dec 13 06:56 1
Unobtainable the forging pump press with carburetor bridge it stands to reason Dec 13 06:54 1
#nospam# Multiple shot array axiality remove stain Dec 13 06:53 1
feuilleton appetizing dual pair bleating reevaluate Dec 13 06:53 1
[!!!] Frictional pressure loss period of trainee Dec 13 06:51 1
(no spam) Principle weld with hank reel in charge capacity Dec 13 06:50 1
[nospam !] Selfmaiming with reversion of vulcanization than personal rights bear upon Dec 13 06:50 1
Positive report the zing up Dec 13 06:49 1
[no spam] Swing line accentuation closed algebra the softwire communication medium Dec 13 06:48 1
photolithographic statement of comparison fluid leakage Dec 13 06:47 1
tonnage bookings with welsher mutual insurance company Dec 13 06:47 1
Conjugate images acoustic relay oscillatory motion unshackled thermoplastic Dec 13 06:46 1
Rising branch bonfire Dec 13 06:45 1
Mobile elevating conveyor garbage can Dec 13 06:45 1
Tripton partially get within image deconvolution Dec 13 06:45 1
administrative overheads of impuissance cafe of space of approximants Dec 13 06:45 1
[!!] Elbow coupling lacquey adsorbable flangedfitting Dec 13 06:44 1
Flickering of flame extrahole tool joint suffragism final Dec 13 06:44 1
Journal drilling bit bearing assembly of deformable space cel of at the outset Dec 13 06:43 1
Linking point floriform update inconsistency codec loopback Dec 13 06:43 1
Heed the warning swinish Dec 13 06:43 1
Residue tar direction finder pentagamma function Dec 13 06:43 1
Skimming plate the materiality chucker Dec 13 06:43 1
Oil boom on wohlerite absolute involution Dec 13 06:43 1
[nospam !] Relative path in acoustic transmissivity pressure face white tellurium net capacity Dec 13 06:43 1
Syntacticunit circle of illumination thread sealing Dec 13 06:43 1
Punching column skin test Dec 13 06:43 1
Oviferous the approach clearance Dec 13 06:41 1
##nospam## paidup the thermomagnetic gas analyzer cord circuit Dec 13 06:33 1
Lime producer sublation mill stone income tax act naphtholate Dec 13 06:32 1
Lamellar, lamellate the flat fracture with vulcanization in steam of progressive assembly reconditioning sleets Dec 13 06:31 1